Note: The English Journal is celebrating 100 years
of publication. In this particular article, today’s English teachers talk about
an article from the Journal that
caused them to act.
Name
of Article:
“On the Uses of Rubrics: Reframing the Great Rubric Debate: by Eric D. Turley
and Chris W. Gallagher (March 2009).
Teacher
who read it and acted on it: Karin Jozefowski, Superstition High School, Mesa,
Arizona.
Quote: “…but as
Turley and Gallagher aptly noted, rubrics should be more than a prescriptive
tool. They should be a negotiated language for discussing quality in writing if
they are to incite and inform dynamic dialogue in the classroom. Turley and
Gallagher acknowledge and honor the slippery subjectivity of assessment by
viewing rubrics as a flexible tool when created by students and teacher
collaboratively. Since my reading of that article, every writing assignment in
my class reflects, directly or indirectly, on the four guiding questions they
posed because they offered more than a framework for assessing writing. They
offered a framework for teaching writing as an active learning process.” P. 22.
Comment: The rubrics probably change for each writing
assignment. As the author states, the changing rubrics become an excellent tool
for teaching writing. RayS.
Title: “An English
Journal Article That Made a Difference: A Forum.” Compiled by D Zancanella. English Journal (January 2012), 19-26.
No comments:
Post a Comment